On 3/4/2011 9:26 AM, Michal Bielicki wrote: > The license was established by a company called Affero Inc. and was > adopted and adjusted by the FSF in 2007 to form a new version called > AGPL v3. > As you can verify > here: http://www.dwheeler.com/essays/floss-license-slide.html the > AGPL is incompatible with all GNU Licenses but the GPLv3. When I read this slide I found the following statement: > In this figure, the shaded boxes are the names of different FLOSS > licenses. An arrow from box A to box B means that you /can/ combine > software with these licenses; the combined result effectively has the > license of B, possibly with additions from A. To see if software can > be combined, just start at their respective licenses, and find a > common box you can reach following the arrows (aka “following the > slide”). For example, Apache 2.0-licensed software and GPLv2+-licensed > software can both reach “GPLv3 or GPLv3+”, so they can be combined > using GPLv3 or GPLv3+. This figure has been carefully crafted so > following a path determines if two licenses are compatible. For more > information you must examine the license text, but this gives the > basic answer quickly. This slide says to me that the ONLY GPL license NOT compatible with AGPL is GPLv2. All the other GPL Licenses have an arrow that reaches AGPL. MPL 1.1, on the other hand, can only be reached by BSD-new, and MIT X11. Thus, if you are using MPL1.1 with any version of (L)GPL code, you are already violating the license terms.
-- Norman Branitsky +1 416.798.7948 Cherniak Software Development Corporation Fax: +1 416.798.0948 509-2001 Sheppard Avenue East [email protected] Toronto, ON M2J 4Z8 sip:[email protected] Canada http://www.CherniakSoftware.com
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
