Just to keep people posted, there is a SF board meeting this Thursday where this will try to be decided and as it stands now, I will have a strong vote against this as I outlined. I could change my vote should new information emerge. If you have a response on either side that you haven't already given, try to have it in by then. --Thanks _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
- Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs open source licensi... Martin Steinmann
- Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs open source lic... Michal Bielicki
- Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs open sourc... Martin Steinmann
- Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs open s... Michal Bielicki
- Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs open s... Todd Hodgen
- Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs open s... Michael Picher
- Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs open source licensing Michal Bielicki
- Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs open source licensing -- So... Michal Bielicki
- Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs open source licensing Norman Branitsky
- Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs open source licensing Douglas Hubler
- Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs open source licensing Douglas Hubler
- Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs open source licensing Tony Graziano
