On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Matthew Kitchin (usenet/public) <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry. I meant Ezuce is able to reproduce it I believe.
I made some tests by running sipXconfig with concurrent garbage collector and notice on my dev machine that it will use much smaller footprint: just ~ 86M instead 179M. However looks like it doesn't have any effect on yours so I'll go back to the drawing board, stress with larger backups to see if reproduce and come up with something George _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
