Yep, seems like it, probably any value other then 0 would do, have you
tested this Cyril?
Could be nice info for the
http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/Counterpath+Bria+Softphone
page.
Paul
BTW: Brian is "the" Bria user!
Michael Picher <mpic...@ezuce.com> wrote on 21-09-2011 15:48:24:
>
> So Brian doesn't like a weight of 0... interesting.
> On Sep 21, 2011 8:49 AM, "cyril constantin" <cyril.constan...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > To resolve this problem I have changed DNS configuration from:
> >
> > _sip._tcp.webcti.local. 1800 IN SRV 1 0 5060
> > ps0sipx01.webcti.local.
> > _sip._tcp.webcti.local. 1800 IN SRV 1 0 5060
> > ps0sipx02.webcti.local.
> > _sip._tcp.webcti.local. 1800 IN SRV 1 0 5060
> > ps0sipx03.webcti.local.
> >
> > To:
> >
> > _sip._tcp.webcti.local. 1800 IN SRV 1 33 5060
> > ps0sipx01.webcti.local.
> > _sip._tcp.webcti.local. 1800 IN SRV 1 33 5060
> > ps0sipx02.webcti.local.
> > _sip._tcp.webcti.local. 1800 IN SRV 1 33 5060
> > ps0sipx03.webcti.local.
> >
> > Now in sipxecs GUI I can see all my users load balanced between the
three
> > servers and load balance value of 2.78 which is good.
> >
> > I hope it will help others people.
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> > Cyril
> >
> > 2011/9/8 Todd Hodgen <thod...@frontier.com>
> >
> >> Counterpath seems to be a company struggling in many ways. Their
reseller
> >> program was sunk over a year ago. So, resellers such as myself has no
> >> motivation to promote their product. Of course the support issues are
now
> >> famous.****
> >>
> >> ** **
> >>
> >> It may well be time to start collaborating towards integration with
Link,
> >> and forget about Counterpath until they get serious about their
business.*
> >> ***
> >>
> >> ** **
> >>
> >> *From:* sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:
> >> sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] *On Behalf Of
*pscheep...@epo.org
> >> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:11 AM
> >> *To:* Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
> >> *Cc:* Discussion list for users of sipXecs software;
> >> sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
> >> *Subject:* Re: [sipx-users] Bria provisioning and SRV load
balance****
> >>
> >> ** **
> >>
> >> I've got slightly better experience with Counterpath.
> >> I just send mails to supp...@counterpath.com and then wait, remind
them,
> >> wait (reat n times) and eventually, maybe, the problem gets sorted.
> >> But for example the XMPP part of Bria is still far from stable
although
> >> it's known for about half a year now.
> >>
> >> The product is also not developing fast enough, I think Counterpath
is more
> >> focussed on other things.
> >> Also as a result of this I'm afraid (scared/shocked) that our company
will
> >> jump on the Lync bandwagon
> >> because there's no good SIP video and collaboration client (and Msoft
is
> >> pushing really really hard).
> >>
> >> Paul
> >>
> >> Kyle Haefner <kyle.haef...@colostate.edu> wrote on 07-09-2011
17:22:06:
> >>
> >> > HA! When I have complained, I've always gotten the response; "We
can
> >> > fix this for you if you want to pay us for a custom build."
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Worley, Dale R (Dale)
> >> > <dwor...@avaya.com> wrote:
> >> > >> From: pscheep...@epo.org [pscheep...@epo.org]
> >> > >>
> >> > >> If the sip domain has more then 1 sip SRV
> >> > >> records with equal priority then Bria will pick one of them. I
do
> >> > >> remember that newer Bria's always picks the first SRV,
> >> > >
> >> > > That is to say, Bria does not properly implement SRV records.
> >> > >
> >> > > You should complain to the vendor.
> >> > >
> >> > > Dale
> >> > > _______________________________________________
> >> > > sipx-users mailing list
> >> > > sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> >> > > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Kyle Haefner, M.S.
> >> > Communication Systems Programmer
> >> > Colorado State University
> >> > Fort Collins, CO
> >> > Phone: 970-491-1012
> >> > Email: kyle.haef...@colostate.edu
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > sipx-users mailing list
> >> > sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> >> > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/****
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> No virus found in this message.
> >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> >> Version: 10.0.1392 / Virus Database: 1520/3882 - Release Date:
09/07/11***
> >> *
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> sipx-users mailing list
> >> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> >> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
> >>_______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list
> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
