I saw that post. I have not digested it yet. There are two different points of view on it "within" the sip stack itself, but I will post that to the appropriate thread after I get some rest and look at it fresh.
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Mark Dutton <repl...@datamerge.com.au>wrote: > > > Actually Tony, I do agree with you to a point. Accommodating > higher bandwidth codecs is not really such a huge issue > these days. Even here in Australia bandwidth is getting > cheaper and I suppose we could end it there with this post. > > I have another post where I am asking for admission control. > That is really the major issue as it is impossible to > control how many calls traverse a link no matter what the > protocol with sipX. All the QoS in the world won't help if > the source of the traffic is overcommitting itself. > -- > Regards > > Mark Dutton > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net Fax: 434.465.6833 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Linked-In Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/tony-graziano/14/4a6/7a4 Ask about our Internet Fax services! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Using or developing for sipXecs from SIPFoundry? Ask me about sipX-CoLab 2013! <http://sipxcolab2013.eventbrite.com/?discount=tony2013> -- LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 sip: helpd...@voice.myitdepartment.net Helpdesk Customers: http://myhelp.myitdepartment.net Blog: http://blog.myitdepartment.net
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
