Mark, thanks anyway. I appreciate the replies. We haven't gotten far enough to try TBCT yet! I like you're thinking, though.
George, I think I'm onto something. I've recreated this scenario with two local users, 1821 and 4821. 1821 is set to forward to 2169311212 after 4 seconds. 4821 calls 1821. 1821 doesn't answer, and the call forwards as expected. But, if I remove 4821's "Local Dialing" privilege, 1821 is no longer able to forward 4821 to the PSTN. Straight to voicemail - just like my external testing. It appears sipXproxy is using the privileges of the original caller rather than those of the one doing the forwarding. There is some discussion about this in XX-422. I'm new enough to sipX this is the first time I've attempted a snapshot. Seems simple enough. Is it just as simple to tail the last 1000 lines of sipXproxy.log and sipregistrar.log? Regardless of the approach, do I reply with them as an attachment, or is there another preference? - Jeff On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 5:36 PM, George Niculae <geo...@ezuce.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 12:34 AM, Mark A. Smith <masm...@bcslive.biz> > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Jeff, > > Thanks for the reply. > > My knee jerk reaction when I first saw your post is that you > > may have had multiple PRIs across multiple TDM groups. I'm > > glad you've dug into this a bit. > > By default, inter B-channel transfer (hair pinning) is not > > allowed via AOS switchboard. However, I was running on a > > number of assumptions. > > Best, > > Mark > > Looks like time to recreate it with proxy and registrar on debug and > take log snapshot (Diagnostics > Snapshot) > > George > >
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
