Hi, Sorry for late reply, hope this will be still helpful.
On 7/25/07, Mariana Draper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > yes, we are using sipXtapi-media-update branch, but an old revision. We > downloaded a revision las year (i dont remember right now which one was) and > we started developing video on our own. > The revision we downloaded did not have much implementation for video so we > had to do it on our own. We decided that a good way to do it could be using > an architecture similar to that one used for audio transmission. > Thats why i am interested in understandin how sockets are dealt with in > audio implementation. Well, if you'll grab latest sipXtapi-media-update, you'll find video almost working under Windows. And the problem with sockets is solved in it. ;) I spent much time last year (and beginning of this year), bringing up video support to sipXtapi. And while it is not yet production-ready, it may be a good point to start with, instead of reimplementing all things from scratch. I've put much time on design and architecture of video subsystem, however not finished its implementation. And my design also based on resources anf flowgraphs, such as audio layer do. If you want to work on video support, I'll be glad to help you bringing up latest sipXtapi-media-update branch to fully working state. And I believe that people from community will be glad to help you testing it. -- Regards, Alexander Chemeris. SIPez LLC. SIP VoIP, IM and Presence Consulting http://www.SIPez.com tel: +1 (617) 273-4000 _______________________________________________ sipxtapi-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipxtapi-dev/
