Of course, thank you very much :-)
Regards,
Daníel
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [email protected]> Subject: Re: [sipxtapi-dev] sipxtapi and
> multiple lines> Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:01:44 +0200> > When you get a new
> call event, you get the line id ... as you know the line> identity you
> registered for this id, you should know which phone number has> been called.>
> > stipus> > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Daniel Sigurgeirsson"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> To: <[email protected]>> Sent: Wednesday,
> August 15, 2007 11:40 AM> Subject: [sipxtapi-dev] sipxtapi and multiple
> lines> > > > Hi all,> > my application is now working, and currently it only
> registers one line.> There does not seem to be any problem with handling
> multiple calls at the> same time.> > What I would like to do now is to extend
> it so it can register more than one> line. I.e. define a few phone numbers in
> the PBX, which the users could> call, and my application would handle them
> all. But I'm not sure what is the> correct way to do this. In the beginning,
> an application must call> sipxInitialize( ), and pass in among others an
> identity. But the phone> numbers would probably be defined with different
> user names and passwords.> Should I just pick one and use that to construct
> the identity passed to> sipxInitialize? AFAIK, then the sipxtapi functions
> should get called like> this:> > sipxInitialize( ... , identity, )> > for
> every line I want to register to:> call sipxLineAdd( ..., identity, )> call
> sipxLineAddCredential( user, pass, realm )> call sipxLineRegister> end for>
> Is this correct? In my current setup I'm only using one line, so therefore>
> the identity passed to sipxInitialize and to sipxLineAdd is the same.>
> Wouldn't that change when I start supporting more lines?> > Furthermore, when
> a call is received, I would like to know what number was> called. I can find
> out from what number was called (by calling> sipxCallGetRemoteID), but
> calling sipxCallGetID (which I was hoping should> return the number that was
> called), doesn't return anything (boy the word> "call" is used a lot in this
> sentence...). Am I misunderstanding anything> here?> > As usual, I would
> welcome any insight into this :-)> > Regards,> Daníel>
> _________________________________________________________________> Explore
> the seven wonders of the world>
> http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=7+wonders+world&mkt=en-US&form=QBRE> > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------->
> ----> > > > _______________________________________________> > sipxtapi-dev
> mailing list> > [email protected]> > List Archive:
> http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipxtapi-dev/>
_________________________________________________________________
Explore the seven wonders of the world
http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=7+wonders+world&mkt=en-US&form=QBRE
_______________________________________________
sipxtapi-dev mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipxtapi-dev/
