On Dec 7, 2007, at 7:17 AM, P Kishor wrote: > Indeed, as others have pointed out, BibDesk is an excellent PDF > organizer. There are other drawbacks with BibDesk... one, that it is > only a PDF organizer, hence, is not good at other bits and bobs you > might throw at it... for example, at one point I had the bright idea > of attaching text files in it thinking I would save it some work by > not having to slog through PDFs, but that didn't do any good.
This is incorrect; BibDesk is capable of handling any file type as an attachment. If you have a Spotlight importer that does full-text import for that type, you can search its content as well. If this is not working for you, I'd like to know! Please direct discussion on this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Second, > I am still struggling with being able to take data out of BD for > citations in a seamless manner given my preferred workflow which does > not involve anything to do with TeX. Well, that's your own fault for not using TeX ;). Have you seen the CiteInPages stuff that Jim Harrison is working on? -- adam ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Skim-app-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/skim-app-users
