On 12 May 2009, at 6:54 PM, Alex Montgomery wrote: > Folks- > > I've been thinking about and discussing with some of my colleagues > different workflows that involve Skim and/or BibDesk. One of them > asked if annotations could be tagged or have any other type of > metadata associated with them; for example, if one is going through > documents looking for quotes from a particular person, each quote > could be highlighted and tagged. Then a file (or multiple files, if > doing this from BibDesk) could be searched for that particular tag > separate from the content of the actual highlighting. >
No, there's no support for annotation tags possible. See the various closed RFEs. > It occurred to me that there is already some metadata associated with > annotations (color, line width, etc.), so this might be an easily > extensible property of skim notes. Or it might be a pain to implement, > or impossible, or not worth it. > Impossible, as we won't diverge any more from the PDF specs. > Thoughts? Are there suggestions for ways this could be done within the > existing program that I'm entirely unaware of? > > Thanks > -AHM No, unless you count adding some text to the text associated to a note and using the search field. Christiaan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com _______________________________________________ Skim-app-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/skim-app-users
