On 03/22/2009 10:29 PM, Yaron Minsky wrote: > I'm really confused. People have piped in in both directions on this one, > so does someone have the definitive story? Is 1.0.10 the one that behaves > correctly, or 1.0.9?
So far i haven't heard anyone claim that 1.0.10 works correctly. 1.1.0
works correctly, and david shaw just pointed out that 1.0.9 works
correctly. I believe 1.0.10 is the only version with this particular bug.
> And yes, we should get a 1.0.11 release out soon. I was waiting for the
> IPv6 patch to settle down and for everyone to agree that it worked for IPv4
> and IPv6 installations alike.
do you mean you're hoping to release 1.1.1 soon? Or is there some sort
of branched development process going on?
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
