-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Kim Minh Kaplan schrieb am 08.09.2010 19:09: > Compared to proper deletion of keys from the SKS network these > mecanism enable each server admin to abide by his own policy. They > also have their cons: solution 1 could lead to some form of > partitioning of the network. Also peers will know which key is being > blacklisted through the recon protocol. Solution 2 could be one step > short of fullfilling legal obligations as the data is still in the > database.
It's pretty clear in this direction: the data has to be *deleted*. Which, in this case, affects the local database. Br, Peter -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkyH4nMACgkQcKsx5K5ighwM7ACgjo36+HG0Iwa+VekZk6k2vvuU 2rEAn1ujkNRU/pAT/PpRy/sC/2v2yomd =SPnm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel