It is registered correctly. I just checked my dnssec registration at https://dlv.isc.org/ - see attached screenshot.
Maybe its your server that isn't using the right dnssec server to validate the dns records. Regards, Scott Grayban /"\ \ / ASCII RIBBON X FIGHT BREAST CANCER / \ Christian Felsing said the following on 05/23/2011 01:36 PM: > Seems there is still a servere DNS problem at domain borgnet.us, see > dnscheck, dns server with strict configuration and dnssec validation do > not resolve your domain. > Please consider a review of your dns configuration. > > .us has dnssec signature, so either register your ksk at your registry, > or do not use dnssec records. Same problem may occur to many .de domains > if Denic sign .de zone with its offical key. > > $ dig +dnssec us. > > ; <<>> DiG 9.7.3 <<>> +dnssec us. > ;; global options: +cmd > ;; Got answer: > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 56365 > ;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 4, ADDITIONAL: 1 > > ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: > ; EDNS: version: 0, flags: do; udp: 4096 > ;; QUESTION SECTION: > ;us. IN A > > ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: > us. 900 IN SOA a.cctld.us. > hostmaster.neustar.biz. 2005948660 900 900 > 604800 86400 > us. 900 IN RRSIG SOA 5 1 900 20110622203440 > 20110523193440 22622 us. > F4TJlUKrv5MZjcD1cHqf+1WhaIgdfNTdukRIpgeVIPOIoJPFB+8XbZog > d1Ry5pnKkBVUaxm/c7prAbdqpxlKKSSamVYgKjS5QqjEdSAKm/fuE0MW > 5Vn8D5sHEz6Q63b4IwSFEGVdUV7KyQwpU8Q88/kietjlN2JSbcxYZtWm htM= > us. 900 IN RRSIG NSEC 5 1 86400 20110612115700 > 20110513115013 22622 > us. idJC7rxrfogF5rnTrmrz/TBFnP5MAjoC7agdE4lhuMPWDDNlXhT/uDm/ > +4094m0lPXJSDjNWOiI8VySNAW1karuPZ9B8TQGqx/Pn8H8UCSYPKCm/ > Iyofiajb3G+2paZTjTTwW6t2TWkGaajz4MvUX04m0CP01F57h+5bG9qy clg= > us. 900 IN NSEC 0-.us. NS SOA RRSIG NSEC DNSKEY > TYPE65534 > > ;; Query time: 8 msec > ;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) > ;; WHEN: Mon May 23 22:35:09 2011 > ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 483 > > $ dig +dnssec borgnet.us. > > ; <<>> DiG 9.7.3 <<>> +dnssec borgnet.us. > ;; global options: +cmd > ;; Got answer: > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 12514 > ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 > > ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: > ; EDNS: version: 0, flags: do; udp: 4096 > ;; QUESTION SECTION: > ;borgnet.us. IN A > > ;; Query time: 1825 msec > ;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) > ;; WHEN: Mon May 23 22:35:22 2011 > ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 39 > > $ > > Regards > Christian Felsing > > Am 23.05.2011 22:15, schrieb Scott Grayban: > >> So only the master/top peer servers shows ? Or does the pool rotate >> every 15 levels ? >> >> At least yours is showing up in the "Servers currently not in the pool" >> were as mine doesn't show up in either list. >> >> Regards, >> Scott Grayban >> >> /"\ >> \ / ASCII RIBBON >> X FIGHT BREAST CANCER >> / \ >> >> >> Christian Felsing said the following on 05/23/2011 12:38 PM: >> >>> Kristian (author of status tool) advised my to look at >>> http://code.google.com/p/sks-keyservers-pool/source/browse/trunk/sks-keyservers.net/status-srv/sks.inc.php#104 >>> which shows a limitation of a recursion depth of 15. Server is scanned >>> but funtion returns always false, so server is not added to list. >>> >>> So don't care about that... >>> >>> Christian >>> >>> Am 23.05.2011 18:17, schrieb Scott Grayban: >>> >>> >>>> My server does not show up either. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sks-devel mailing list >> Sks-devel@nongnu.org >> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel >> > >
<<attachment: dnssec.png>>
_______________________________________________ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel