On May 27, 2012, at 9:30 PM, David Benfell wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 05/27/2012 05:17 PM, John Marshall wrote: >> >> What warrant do we have for applying any filtering at the servers >> at all? If the "problem" is one robo-signer, wouldn't it make sense >> to talk to its minders? >> > I finally followed the URL posted at the beginning of this thread: > http://keyserver.kjsl.org:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xd5920e937cc1e39b&op=vindex > > It looks like this key gets re-signed every two weeks or so.
Yup. > > I notice in a couple places in this thread, people are wondering why. > Count me in with that group. Perhaps I'm just lacking imagination, but > John Marshall's advice here seems appropriate. > > But then I also have to ask, how big a problem is this really? Is this Dunno. But integrate out a decade or so: it WILL be a problem eventually. > a common practice? How much space is this kind of thing taking out of > all the certificates (many ancient, many--including some of > mine--never properly revoked) we're currently lugging around? Sure there's lots of other issues. E.g. I'm sure some clever dweeb is already distributing p0rn ion photo id's: too easy to do. 73 de Jeff _______________________________________________ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
