On 2016-08-17 at 06:29 +0200, Gabor Kiss wrote: > According to > https://sks-keyservers.net/status/ks-status.php?server=sks.spodhuis.org > you did not delete keys.niif.hu, however we are not peering since 2011.
Oh? What happened to trigger the removal on your side? > Generally the "Cross-peered" column of the table shows that you have > only six real peers. That's buggy. I _peer_ under the name `sks-peer.spodhuis.org` and always have done, and that's always been what I ask peers to put in their membership files: the serving name and the peering name are distinct, for reasons which I've outlined before. I've just sampled a few of those "Not OK" entries and they're all peering correctly with "sks-peer.spodhuis.org" but the status page is failing to handle that and reporting as "Not OK". This is a bug on Kristian's side. The peering itself works just fine. So in fact, six of my peers are incorrectly listing "sks.spodhuis.org" instead of "sks-peer.spodhuis.org" and as a result are showing up as "OK". Regards, -Phil _______________________________________________ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
