> > According to > > https://sks-keyservers.net/status/ks-status.php?server=sks.spodhuis.org > > you did not delete keys.niif.hu, however we are not peering since 2011. > > Oh? What happened to trigger the removal on your side?
Dear Phil, I really don't know. The reason was not recorded but just the date. I guess your server or the peering itself was inoperable for months. > > Generally the "Cross-peered" column of the table shows that you have > > only six real peers. > > That's buggy. I _peer_ under the name `sks-peer.spodhuis.org` and > always have done, and that's always been what I ask peers to put in > their membership files: the serving name and the peering name are > distinct, for reasons which I've outlined before. > > I've just sampled a few of those "Not OK" entries and they're all > peering correctly with "sks-peer.spodhuis.org" but the status page is > failing to handle that and reporting as "Not OK". > > This is a bug on Kristian's side. > The peering itself works just fine. > > So in fact, six of my peers are incorrectly listing "sks.spodhuis.org" > instead of "sks-peer.spodhuis.org" and as a result are showing up as > "OK". I see. Kristian's spider discovers the graph from node to node. Probably it encountered name sks.spodhuis.org first. This is why it does not like name sks-peer.spodhuis.org. Maybe this phenomenon fobbed me in 2011 too. :-) Regards Gabor _______________________________________________ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
