> On 5 May 2018, at 09:38, Andrew Gallagher <andr...@andrewg.com> wrote: > > >> On 5 May 2018, at 09:03, Phil Pennock <sks-devel-p...@spodhuis.org> wrote: >> >> While you could modify the protocol to do something like announce a >> key-count first, that's still only protection against accidental >> misconfiguration >
Sorry for the double. We don’t need to modify the protocol to enable such checks. Whenever a server tries to recon with us, we can perform a callback against its status page and run whatever sanity tests we want before deciding whether to allow recon to proceed. This could be rolled out without any need for coordination. A _______________________________________________ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
