Hi Werner, all, i'd appreciate if we can close this "GDPR and key servers" subject and end sending mails about it to three mailing lists. The Autocrypt ML subscribers are likely either also subscribed to at least one of openpgp-email/gnupg-devel or mostly not interested in further detailed discussions about key servers. so let's at least leave out the Autocrypt ML.
thanks, holger On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 10:13 +0100, Werner Koch wrote: > On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 17:27, a...@datenreisen.de said: > > > I do roughly recal that such a verification process has been discussed for > > the SKS keyservers at one of the pgp-summit before, but i wonder what > > happened to the idea. However, if it that is “good enough” to be compliant > > This requires that there are no rogue keyservers in the network and that > in turn means that they are under the control of a single entity. Or > in short, let Google take care of it. > > Such verification will be a single point of failure and it would be > trivial for governments or corporations to take down a key. > > > Shalom-Salam, > > Werner > > -- > Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. > _______________________________________________ > Autocrypt mailing list > > Post: autocr...@lists.mayfirst.org > List info: https://lists.mayfirst.org/mailman/listinfo/autocrypt > > To Unsubscribe > Send email to: autocrypt-unsubscr...@lists.mayfirst.org > Or visit: > https://lists.mayfirst.org/mailman/options/autocrypt/holger%40merlinux.eu > > You are subscribed as: hol...@merlinux.eu
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
