JAWS should translate the text representations, such as a colon and a right paren, into names, if you have the dictionary loaded, regardless of whether you have Skype set to use graphical emoticons. However, my understanding is that if you have graphical emoticons enabled in Skype, the graphics will replace the text representations in most places, thus effectively preventing the dictionary of names from being used. I have not tested this to see just where the graphics appear versus where you still see text; I'll leave that to someone who wants to mess with it. :-)
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 03:57:48PM +0200, Kostadin Kolev wrote: > Hello, Doug, > > Are you saying that if graphical emoticons are turned on, JAWS can't > speak their text representation? Mine are turned on and JAWS speaks the > text representation correctly, even with the dictionary file from your > site. I actually use another dictionary file, witch was translated in > bulgarian. It's not as complete as that provided by Gordan, but it > serves us bulgarian users very well. > > P.S.: Sorry for misspelling your name in my previous letter. > > Best wishes! > Kostadin Kolev > > Doug Lee wrote: >> Unchecking the emoticon option makes Skype show text strings instead >> of graphical icons for emoticons in chat and mood text. The >> dictionary file Gordan put together relies on those text strings; you >> can't so easily, and without system dependencies, create a system for >> translating the graphical icons. >> >> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 02:43:35PM +0200, Kostadin Kolev wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> Gianfranco, yes, those terms mean the same thing. By default they are >>> checked. I don't know if we should uncheck them or not. Mine are >>> checked and also the option below them "and animate them" is >>> checked. I don't recall to have some problems with those 2 options >>> checked. But on Duck's site, it says to uncheck them for better >>> compatibility with JAWS. >>> Duck, why do we have to uncheck them? What is the difference if we do >>> and if we don't? >>> >>> P.S.: The right word is "emoticons" and not "emonicons", just for clarity. >>> >>> Best wishes! >>> Kostadin Kolev >>> >>> Gianfranco Di Cosmo wrote: >>>> Question for clerification: >>>> >>>> >>>> The graphics emonicons, is it also called, animated emonicons? >>>> >>>> >>>> In the options it says, animated emonicons checked. >>>> >>>> >>>> Do we uncheck it? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks for posting to the skype english list. To access scripts for the >>>> latest version of skype go to >>>> http://www.dlee.org/skype >>>> To access tutorials and other goodies go to >>>> http://www.marrie.org/skype/skype.html >>>> thanks and have a wonderful day. >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Skypeenglish mailing list >>>> Skypeenglish at emissives.com >>>> http://emissives.com/mailman/listinfo/skypeenglish_emissives.com >>>> >>>> >>> Thanks for posting to the skype english list. To access scripts for the >>> latest version of skype go to >>> http://www.dlee.org/skype >>> To access tutorials and other goodies go to >>> http://www.marrie.org/skype/skype.html >>> thanks and have a wonderful day. >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Skypeenglish mailing list >>> Skypeenglish at emissives.com >>> http://emissives.com/mailman/listinfo/skypeenglish_emissives.com >> > > Thanks for posting to the skype english list. To access scripts for the > latest version of skype go to > http://www.dlee.org/skype > To access tutorials and other goodies go to > http://www.marrie.org/skype/skype.html > thanks and have a wonderful day. > > > _______________________________________________ > Skypeenglish mailing list > Skypeenglish at emissives.com > http://emissives.com/mailman/listinfo/skypeenglish_emissives.com -- Doug Lee dgl at dlee.org http://www.dlee.org SSB BART Group doug.lee at ssbbartgroup.com http://www.ssbbartgroup.com "The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not 'Eureka!' ('I found it!') but rather 'hmm.... that's funny...'" -- Isaac Asimov
