On 2020-05-05 19:23, David Chmelik <[email protected]> put forth the proposition: > On 5/5/20 5:31 PM, Dave Woodfall wrote: > > On 2020-05-05 23:18, > > M Wedin <[email protected]> put forth the proposition: > > > 2020-05-05 18:21 GMT+02:00, Dave Woodfall <[email protected]>: > > > > On 2020-05-05 16:16, > > > > M Wedin <[email protected]> put forth the proposition: > > > > > The old qt 5.9.9 was removed. > > > > The old qt 5.9.9 was renamed to qt5-legacy. > > > I removed it per recommendation. Sorry if I wasn't clear. I wanted as > > > few obstacles as possible. > > > > > > ------------- > > > If Qt5 fails to build, it may be worth using the following > > > steps. > > > > > > 1 Uninstall the old Qt5 package > > > ------------- > > My point was that if qt5-5.12 takes too long or won't build, then you > > could use qt5-legacy instead of qt5. > > If all one has to do is remove & rebuild, surely it's worth the wait to > compile to upgrade? That's what I'll do. Another option might be if one of > almost all pre-built SlackOnly.com (‘slonly’) packages, if you judge them > trustworthy.
I don't know slackonly enough to comment on that.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ SlackBuilds-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/
