Opensource Obscure wrote: > Also, it puzzles me a bit that two Lindens commented this proposal > without inviting Joy to respect their own copyright + the GPL license > on the SL viewer. If I'm not wrong, sources should be provided > when you publish binaries of modified version of the SL viewer.
Rob did suggest that publishing source code would be the polite thing to do. -Jason
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
