I have attached two patches that add support for parameterized logging. Comments?
James A. N. Stauffer http://jamesjive.blogspot.com Are you good? Take the test at http://www.livingwaters.com/good/ On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 8:17 AM, James A. N. Stauffer < [email protected]> wrote: > (I didn't notice any FAQ/guidelines, etc so please direct me to them if > the exist so I can follow protocol.) > > My employer has many projects that use log4j and slf4j is now the approved > logging framework. I would like the conversion to make use of the format > messages with parameterized logging and remove the calls to is*Enabled(). > > It appears that slf4j-migrator doesn't support that so is there any > comment, direction, etc on me adding support for that? > > James A. N. Stauffer http://jamesjive.blogspot.com > Are you good? Take the test at http://www.livingwaters.com/good/ >
0002-Added-new-conversion-rule-that-changes-to-parameteri.patch
Description: Binary data
0001-ConversionRule-no-longer-tied-to-patterns-so-impleme.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ slf4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-dev
