No, I don't think so - it's been noticed! Rob
----- Original Message ----- > From: "James A. N. Stauffer" <[email protected]> > To: "slf4j developers list" <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, 30 May, 2013 2:02:30 PM > Subject: Re: [slf4j-dev] slf4j-migrator: format messages with parameterized > logging > Do I need to do something more than creating the pill request on > GitHub? I understand that people have other priorities -- I just > wanted to make sure that I didn't put it in a black hole. :-) > > > > James A. N. Stauffer http://jamesjive.blogspot.com > Are you good? Take the test at http://www.livingwaters.com/good/ > > > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 1:00 PM, James A. N. Stauffer < > [email protected] > wrote: > > > > Thanks for the tip. Created. > > > > > James A. N. Stauffer http://jamesjive.blogspot.com > Are you good? Take the test at http://www.livingwaters.com/good/ > > > > > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Robert Elliot < [email protected] > > wrote: > > > > > I'm not a committer, so this isn't a rebuke or anything, just a > friendly suggestion. You might get more comments & chance of a merge > via a pull request on GitHub - easier for everyone. > > > Rob > > > > On 21 May 2013, at 19:57, "James A. N. Stauffer" < > [email protected] > wrote: > > > > > > Attached fixes/improvements. > > > > James A. N. Stauffer http://jamesjive.blogspot.com > Are you good? Take the test at http://www.livingwaters.com/good/ > > > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:57 AM, James A. N. Stauffer < > [email protected] > wrote: > > > > I have attached two patches that add support for parameterized > logging. Comments? > > > > > James A. N. Stauffer http://jamesjive.blogspot.com > Are you good? Take the test at http://www.livingwaters.com/good/ > > > > > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 8:17 AM, James A. N. Stauffer < > [email protected] > wrote: > > > > > (I didn't notice any FAQ/guidelines, etc so please direct me to them > if the exist so I can follow protocol.) > > > My employer has many projects that use log4j and slf4j is now the > approved logging framework. I would like the conversion to make use of > the format messages with parameterized logging and remove the calls to > is*Enabled(). > > > It appears that slf4j-migrator doesn't support that so is there any > comment, direction, etc on me adding support for that? > > > James A. N. Stauffer http://jamesjive.blogspot.com > Are you good? Take the test at http://www.livingwaters.com/good/ > > > > > <0003-Fixed-minor-bugs-with-format-conversion.patch> > > > _______________________________________________ > slf4j-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-dev > _______________________________________________ > slf4j-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > slf4j-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-dev _______________________________________________ slf4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-dev
