Am 13.08.2011 um 22:17 schrieb jakartaman: > Now someone needs to take a decision!!11!!
Well, just my opinion: both make sense to me. Erik's original version clearly and tersely describes the (gradual) transition from a logging framework other than SLF4J up to the point where just SLF4J backed by Logback is used. And I presume depicting this transition was Erik's intention. Ceki's version appeared more comprehensive to me in depicting all the combinations in which SLF4J can be deployed. Honestly, however, I was interrupted a bit by the arrows since their semantics is not intuitive and was also not explained in the legend. To me they are not really necessary and I would prefer the typical layered way of depicting it using vertically stacked boxes. To conclude, both are reasonable to the projects documentation, just at different places: Erik's could be used for supporting one way (the preferred way?) of (gradually) moving from another logging framework to "pure" SLF4J logging; Ceki's could be used to support all the different deployment combinations. Thorsten > > :-) > > On 08/13/2011 10:51 AM, Rusty Wright wrote: >> I definitely like http://slf4j.org/images/concrete-bindings.png >> >> Straightforward and clear. >> >> On 2011-08-12 12:32, Ceki Gülcü wrote: >>> I've taken yet another crack at this: >>> >>> http://slf4j.org/images/concrete-bindings.odg >>> http://slf4j.org/images/concrete-bindings.png >>> >>> http://slf4j.org/images/legacy.odg >>> http://slf4j.org/images/legacy.png >>> >>> The idea is to illustrate concrete binding setups using lots of arrows. :-) >>> >>> On 12/08/2011 9:04 AM, Erik van Oosten wrote: >>>> Hi David, >>>> >>>> I liked the clearness of your images as the result of using no arrows >>>> and different colors for each function. I did have troubles with the >>>> text, the font size is a tad small for me. >>>> >>>> The second image does not show that commons-logging attempts to find a >>>> logging implementation such as log4j, nor that is specially wired in the >>>> classpath of many servlet containers. Not sure how to do visualize that >>>> though. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Erik. >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> slf4j-user mailing list >> slf4j-user@qos.ch >> http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user > > _______________________________________________ > slf4j-user mailing list > slf4j-user@qos.ch > http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user _______________________________________________ slf4j-user mailing list slf4j-user@qos.ch http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user
