Am 14.08.2011 um 17:33 schrieb Erik van Oosten: > Small correction: the 'original' version is David's (jakartaman).
uups, sorry ;-) Thorsten > > For the rest I agree. > > Regards, > Erik. > > > Op 14-08-11 13:35, Thorsten Möller schreef: >> Am 13.08.2011 um 22:17 schrieb jakartaman: >> >>> Now someone needs to take a decision!!11!! >> Well, just my opinion: both make sense to me. Erik's original version >> clearly and tersely describes the (gradual) transition from a logging >> framework other than SLF4J up to the point where just SLF4J backed by >> Logback is used. And I presume depicting this transition was Erik's >> intention. >> >> Ceki's version appeared more comprehensive to me in depicting all the >> combinations in which SLF4J can be deployed. Honestly, however, I was >> interrupted a bit by the arrows since their semantics is not intuitive and >> was also not explained in the legend. To me they are not really necessary >> and I would prefer the typical layered way of depicting it using vertically >> stacked boxes. >> >> To conclude, both are reasonable to the projects documentation, just at >> different places: Erik's could be used for supporting one way (the preferred >> way?) of (gradually) moving from another logging framework to "pure" SLF4J >> logging; Ceki's could be used to support all the different deployment >> combinations. >> >> Thorsten >> >> >> >> >>> :-) >>> >>> On 08/13/2011 10:51 AM, Rusty Wright wrote: >>>> I definitely like http://slf4j.org/images/concrete-bindings.png >>>> >>>> Straightforward and clear. >>>> >>>> On 2011-08-12 12:32, Ceki Gülcü wrote: >>>>> I've taken yet another crack at this: >>>>> >>>>> http://slf4j.org/images/concrete-bindings.odg >>>>> http://slf4j.org/images/concrete-bindings.png >>>>> >>>>> http://slf4j.org/images/legacy.odg >>>>> http://slf4j.org/images/legacy.png >>>>> >>>>> The idea is to illustrate concrete binding setups using lots of arrows. >>>>> :-) >>>>> >>>>> On 12/08/2011 9:04 AM, Erik van Oosten wrote: >>>>>> Hi David, >>>>>> >>>>>> I liked the clearness of your images as the result of using no arrows >>>>>> and different colors for each function. I did have troubles with the >>>>>> text, the font size is a tad small for me. >>>>>> >>>>>> The second image does not show that commons-logging attempts to find a >>>>>> logging implementation such as log4j, nor that is specially wired in the >>>>>> classpath of many servlet containers. Not sure how to do visualize that >>>>>> though. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Erik. >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> slf4j-user mailing list >>>> slf4j-user@qos.ch >>>> http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user >>> _______________________________________________ >>> slf4j-user mailing list >>> slf4j-user@qos.ch >>> http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user >> _______________________________________________ >> slf4j-user mailing list >> slf4j-user@qos.ch >> http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user > > > -- > Erik van Oosten > http://www.day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > slf4j-user mailing list > slf4j-user@qos.ch > http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user _______________________________________________ slf4j-user mailing list slf4j-user@qos.ch http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user