Quoting Christopher Lenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 23.07.2001 06:48:20, "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's true. I'm using the approach of having some JSP pages in WEB-
> INF/include that I include in from my WebdavServlet subclass via
> RequestDispatcher. This is working very well so far, albeit I'm not
> using the SlideDirContext (and I have no idea how that actually works,
> never tested it).
>
> So, the changes I've outlined above are pretty much done, but rather
> extensive: I've moved all the HTML generation code into the
> WebdavServlet,
Is it a good idea to move that code there ? I hope it doesn't make the WebDAV
servlet a mess.
> and needed to make a couple of methods in WebdavMethod
> static and/or public (e.g. isCollection()). Everything is completely
> backwards compatible though, and I've not had any problems so far
> (which is pretty unusual for me - I seem to attract problems ;>).
A few of the calls should be static anyway, or moved elsewhere, since they
don't use the method state.
> I'll go through everything and clean up my changes, and commit a patch
> later.
>
> On a related note, I've started with a JSP taglib for Slide (because I
> needed one). It is based on and uses JSPTL/EA1 (JSR 52,
> http://jakarta.apache.org/taglibs/doc/jsptl-doc/intro.html), which of
> course is in a fairly early state, but looks very promising and works
> very well IMHO.
Way cool !
> Would there be interest in incorporating that into the
> Slide-CVS at some point (meaning: even though it uses JSPTL) ?
No, that's great, because :
- Pierre [the JSPTL spec lead] is very open about the dev process
- The RI for JSPTL is at Jakarta
If you're interested in JSPTL, you can join the expert group and help define it
(I'll ask Pierre about that if you're interested).
Remy
