24.07.2001 23:13:34, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Quoting Christopher Lenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> 23.07.2001 06:48:20, "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> So, the changes I've outlined above are pretty much done, but 
>> rather extensive: I've moved all the HTML generation code into the 
>> WebdavServlet,
>
>Is it a good idea to move that code there ? I hope it doesn't make 
>the WebDAV servlet a mess.

Not really. At least it's not more messy than having it all in 
GetMethod(). Ideally, it should be in a separate class 
(CollectionListingGenerator or something like that), but then it would 
also be nice to separate out some code from WebdavMethod and pack it 
into better shareable classes.

Personally, I like to keep changes somewhat simple at first. The code 
could still be migrated into a separate class later on.

[snip]

>> On a related note, I've started with a JSP taglib for Slide 
>> (because I needed one). It is based on and uses JSPTL/EA1 (JSR 52, 
>> http://jakarta.apache.org/taglibs/doc/jsptl-doc/intro.html), which 
>> of course is in a fairly early state, but looks very promising and 
>> works very well IMHO.
>
>Way cool !
>
>> Would there be interest in incorporating that into the 
>> Slide-CVS at some point (meaning: even though it uses JSPTL) ?
>
>No, that's great, because :
>- Pierre [the JSPTL spec lead] is very open about the dev process
>- The RI for JSPTL is at Jakarta
>
>If you're interested in JSPTL, you can join the expert group and help 
>define it (I'll ask Pierre about that if you're interested).

heh. I wouldn't dare to call myself an expert in JSP issues ;o)

-chris
________________________________________________________________
cmlenz at gmx.de


Reply via email to