Exchanged xml-im-exporter 1.0 with 1.1 having a BSD like license.
Oliver
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Oliver Zeigermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK, it seems releasing it as BSD would be better, right?
Certainly.
As I already said on a different thread on a different list, any license that doesn't limit Slide's users more than the ASF license will do.
I see no problem to release an xml-im-exporter 1.1 under BSD, it actually has some fine new features that could be released along.
Stefan, would this be a good solution?
It would be my personal preference, yes 8-)
If you want to include the jar in Slide's CVS, please also ensure you are following the license verbatim. I see you have an ant.jar in CVS as well, which means you'd have to include Ant's LICENSE.TXT if it is Ant < 1.6.1, since it still used ASF License 1.1 and this one is different for each project.
And I'm not 100% sure, but I think geronimo-spec might require a NOTICE file. You may want to revisit all jars in your CVS module.
Cheers
Stefan
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
