Dear all, I hate to reply to myself, but I was just wondering if the offer still stands... I would love to help out and it would be great if you guys gave me that chance!
Best, Max > -----Original Message----- > From: Max Pfingsthorn > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 11:20 > To: Slide Developers Mailing List > Subject: RE: enhancements/fixes for slide 2.1 > > > Hello everyone! > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 12:33 > > To: 'Slide Developers Mailing List' > > Subject: AW: enhancements/fixes for slide 2.1 > > > > Hi Hippo! > > Hippo is just my employer ;) Just call me Max. > > > Fromm y point of view it would be great if you would become a slide > > committer and could add patches to the sources directly. If you are > > interested, I would start a voting thread on this mailing list. > > That would be great! I would be very honored. > > > I think most of your patches are very helpful for the slide > community. > > Thanks, I do my best. > > > One comment to your patches regarding the lucene-based search: > > If you use lucene directly to limit the results this might > cause some > > trouble if you are using acl's. The acl's get evaluated after slide > > retrieves the search result from lucene. If you for example > > specify a limit > > of 10 results and the user executing the DASL-request has no > > permissions to > > read half of them, he would only get 5 files even if he > > specified to get 10. > > So it would be very helpful to have a configurable switch to > > select if you > > want to have a fast system (with the risk of wrong number of > > results) or a > > slower search with correct results. > > Actually, you cannot tell Lucene to only return so many hits. > The nice thing about Lucene's Hits datastructure is that it > lazy-loads data from the index. That way, it can return the > full structure, without much of the overhead, and you can > decide how many you access yourself. What I do is to iterate > through the Hits until I generated as many authorized results > as needed. What makes it fast is that sorting is done in > Lucene as well, so even then, you don't have to load all > results in memory and sort them there as it's done right now. > > > Why have you used JMS to notify cocoon? Have you had a look at the > > Notification abilities in the slide webdavlib? > > I wasn't aware that the webdavlib had such a feature. Also, > when I joined the team here, JMS notification was already implemented. > > Bye! > max > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
