No idea why the tests are failing. Compare the results of the WCK
reference implement to those of your implementation to find out.
Oliver
On Sat, 05 Feb 2005 16:51:52 +0200, Roman D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thank you for the patch! that fixed NPE!
> My WCK store saves properties and return them exactly as they were set
> by client.
> Still I have litmus failures;
>
> -> running `props':
> 0. init.................. pass
> 1. begin................. pass
> 2. propfind_invalid...... pass
> 3. propfind_invalid2..... pass
> 4. propfind_d0........... pass
> 5. propinit.............. pass
> 6. propset............... pass
> 7. propget............... FAIL (No value given for property
> {http://webdav.org/neon/litmus/}prop9)
> 8. propextended.......... pass
> 9. propmove.............. pass
> 10. propget............... FAIL (No value given for property
> {http://webdav.org/neon/litmus/}prop9)
> 11. propdeletes........... pass
> 12. propget............... FAIL (No value given for property
> {http://webdav.org/neon/litmus/}prop9)
> 13. propreplace........... pass
> 14. propget............... FAIL (No value given for property
> {http://webdav.org/neon/litmus/}prop9)
> 15. propnullns............ pass
> 16. propget............... FAIL (No value given for property {}nonamespace)
> 17. prophighunicode....... pass
> 18. propget............... FAIL (No value given for property
> {http://webdav.org/neon/litmus/}high-unicode)
> 19. propvalnspace......... pass
> 20. propwformed........... pass
> 21. propinit.............. pass
> 22. propmanyns............ pass
> 23. propget............... FAIL (No value given for property
> {kappa}somename)
>
> Is it WCK problem or Is there anything I can do to improve situation?
>
> Is WCK supposed to be litmus-proof?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
> > Thanks for reporting. Of course no test should cause a
> > NullPointerException. I have committed a patch that adapts WCK to the
> > new PropertyName version that should fix this issue.
> >
> > Oliver
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 05 Feb 2005 05:07:08 +0200, Roman D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I have store with WCK, and when testing with litmus I get a
> >>
> >>java.lang.NullPointerException
> >> at
> >>org.apache.slide.common.PropertyName.getPropertyName(PropertyName.java:121)
> >> at
> >>org.apache.slide.content.NodeProperty.<init>(NodeProperty.java:117)
> >> at
> >>org.apache.slide.simple.store.WebdavStoreAdapter$TransactionId.retrieveRevisionDescriptor(WebdavStoreAdapter.java:625)
> >>
> >>It has something to do with namespaces, and it happens when litmus test
> >>for setting property "http://something/something/";, value "something"
> >>
> >>Storing of properties implemented same as reference WebdavFileStore, so
> >>I am wondering,
> >>
> >>Is WCK WebDAV-compliant according to litmus test?
> >>Should WCK-based implementation be expected to pass all litmus tests ?
> >>
> >>Thanks.
> >>
> >>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
