The ISO is 193 megs, and according to the second link posted, it's not much different from a minimal installation of arch or debian. Slitaz is still where it's at for portability...
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Rohit Joshi <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Interesting. BTW, we do have a Slitaz uClibc toolchain (not from sources > though) http://hg.slitaz.org/wok/rev/8da46cc14f57 . Some preliminary work > for ARM port uses it: http://labs.slitaz.org/wiki/arm > > Rohit > > > On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Alexander Medvedev <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Have anyone tried Alpine Linux (http://www.alpinelinux.org/)? I used it >> for about a week and found it a real competitor to slitaz. >> Its killer-feature is uClibc - it decreases ram and hdd usage a lot. XFCE >> desktop in 39 Mb? Not a problem for it >> (http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2010/12/02/also-not-a-joke-xfce-on-39mb/) >> So I have two questions - anyone interested in uClibc spin or fork? >> And how to build new slitaz toolchain? >> With best regards, Alexander. > > --- SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
