Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 11:01:19AM -0500, Christopher Browne wrote: > >> For instance, if you have a Really Long cluster namespace name, >> auto-created PK fields start breaking; I have added a check for 1.2 >> which refuses to allow the Really Long cluster name. Unfortunately, >> things we expect to break aren't nearly as easy to test :-(. > > Why not? If there's some code that checks for certain conditions, > you can check at the bounds of those conditions for the relevant > error, no? I don't think it's reasonable to expect 100% coverage -- > that's not what simple regression tests do -- but you can at least do > some minimal checks.
Responding to error messages is tougher than "expecting things to work," that's all... -- (format nil "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "cbbrowne" "ca.afilias.info") <http://dev6.int.libertyrms.com/> Christopher Browne (416) 673-4124 (land) _______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list [email protected] http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
