-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hi, On Sun, 13 Nov 2005, Jan Wieck wrote:
Which actually shows that we are not testing our releases for all "supported" versions. This is really bad and basically shows that Andrew is right with his claim that 1.0 was a better release. There will be no more releases without a complete list of PG-Branch reports. Who else needs to nod on release (package maintainers like Devrim)?
I began installing slony to *all* of my build platforms, to which I'll replicate my web database. Slony will be built from CVS manually (and will be installed from RPMs except FreeBSD ;) ) ). This means that I'll be able to test slony on Red Hat / Fedora Core platforms and also be able to test the RPMs on much platforms. Currently there are test installs on FreeBSD (master), RH9, FC4, RHEL 3 and RHEL 4 (slave) but needs some work on them. So there will be very stable reports for my platforms.
I'm *very* busy this weekend. I'll finish it the week after.So I think this is what I can do for Slony (since I can't contribute the code :) )
Regards, - -- Devrim GUNDUZ Kivi Bilişim Teknolojileri - http://www.kivi.com.tr devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr http://www.gunduz.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDe6xI4zE8DGqpiZARAtoYAJ0a3l/Oaybr3ERyHcIMdqs0j2EPQwCghLQu TP9ZCrF9nU6rsjuyIw1mOyo= =k26r -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list [email protected] http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
