On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 10:52:52AM -0500, Christopher Browne wrote:
> It is uncertain whether you would experience the same thing. The
> problem isn't with Slony-I, per se; it is that there is no mechanism for
> invalidating the old query plans.
I seem to remember Tom Lane suggesting one time that the functions
_ought_ to provide a mechanism for invalidating those plans. Of
course, I don't know how such a thing would work.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This work was visionary and imaginative, and goes to show that visionary
and imaginative work need not end up well.
--Dennis Ritchie
_______________________________________________
Slony1-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
