Andrew Sullivan wrote: >On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 10:52:52AM -0500, Christopher Browne wrote: > > >>It is uncertain whether you would experience the same thing. The >>problem isn't with Slony-I, per se; it is that there is no mechanism for >>invalidating the old query plans. >> >> > >I seem to remember Tom Lane suggesting one time that the functions >_ought_ to provide a mechanism for invalidating those plans. Of >course, I don't know how such a thing would work. > > It's a more general issue, as this applies to pretty well anything, not merely Slony-I...
At one point, Neil Conway said he was going to be looking at the issue; I am not certain that this is yet under way for 8.2; it obviously didn't happen for 8.1... _______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list [email protected] http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
