On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 09:30 -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 03:48:22PM +0200, Csaba Nagy wrote: > > The question is, will it work properly, having foreign keys from one > > set's tables to the other set's tables ? > > Yes, which is also why Slony takes much more aggressive locks than > people sometimes realise. Under at least some circumstances, I know > it will lock _all_ sets even though it doesn't strictly need to. I > think yours may be such a case.
But that will then defeat my purpose, which was not to lock all replicated tables. So basically it's not working as I expected... Cheers, Csaba. _______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list [email protected] http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
