On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 03:35:28PM +0200, Csaba Nagy wrote:
> But that will then defeat my purpose, which was not to lock all
> replicated tables. So basically it's not working as I expected...
I think so, yes. The earliest versions of slony didn't work this
way, but people seemed to think that the additional safety was
needed.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Users never remark, "Wow, this software may be buggy and hard
to use, but at least there is a lot of code underneath."
--Damien Katz
_______________________________________________
Slony1-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
