Oh, by the way, I forgot to mention one thing.  Due to the previous  
DB owner's poor choices, I have a few sequences that use capital  
letters in their names ("Action_id_seq", etc).  When attempting to  
use the slony1_dump script in my previous attempt to get log shipping  
working, I noticed that it rather choked on those.  slony1_dump was  
converting the name to all lowercase, and was unable to find them in  
the schema, as is to be expected.  Has anyone seen this before?

/kurt

On Aug 30, 2007, at 12:59 PM, Kurt Overberg wrote:

> My current problem is that I need to upgrade a 4 node Slony cluster
> from PostgreSQL 8.0.4 to 8.2.4 to take advantage of the performance
> enhancements 8.2 offers.  But before I even think about that, I have
> the ancillary problem that I'm still running Slony 1.1.5, and would
> like to update that (for log shipping and just to stay current) to
> the latest and greatest.  David Fetter on freenode:#postgresql
> strongly suggested I upgrade slony before upgrading postgresql.   So-
> as much as I don't want to "fix" something that ain't "broke", I like
> following Smart People's Advice and I'm going to upgrade Slony to
> 1.2.11.
>
> As I said, I have 4 nodes all running 8.0.4 on linux (redhat).  Slony
> 1.1.5 is installed on all nodes.  From what I've gathered, I've
> determined that the way I'm most comfortable with is described here:
>
> http://www.pgadmin.org/docs/1.4/slony/slonyupgrade.html
>
> ...wherein I create new installs of postgresql 8.0.4 that have the
> newer slony (1.2.11) compiled in.
>
> My proposed upgrade strategy:
>
> 1.  Compile new versions of postgresql 8.0.4 on all machines
>
> 2.  Compile Slony 1.2.11 into that postgresql I just built
>
> 3.  Install my new postgresql in a place other than where my current
> postgresql is installed.  For example- currently, my postgresql is
> installed in /usr/local/pgsql8.0.4, I will probably put the "new"
> version of 8.0.4 in /usr/local/pgsql8.0.4-2.  Do this on all 4 nodes.
>
> 4.  When I'm ready, I take the entire cluster down, including slons
> and all related watchdogs.  Late at night, on a sunday.  Buy wife
> some ice cream so she doesn't mind too much that I'm working late on
> a sunday night.
>
> 5.  I then move or copy my existing data directory over to the "new"
> 8.0.4 data directory, on all 4 nodes.  Possibly I symlink to my
> existing PG data dir (in the "old" 8.0.4 install dir to save time- my
> db is around 30Gb), I would, of course, rather copy the data in case
> things Go Poorly.
>
> 6.  I bring up the "new" 8.0.4 postgresql servers on all 4 nodes.  I
> leave the slons alone for now (down).
>
> 7.  I make sure all 4 "new" postgresql 8.0.4 are accessing the data
> directory properly, run a few queries, no inserts or anything.
>
> 8.  I run the command
>
> update functions (id = <node number>);
>
> ...against the appropriate nodes (my nodes are numbered
> 10,20,30,40).  Question: do the slons need to be running at this
> point or not?  I'm assuming not, but thats just a gut feeling.
>
> 9.  Bring up the new slons
>
> 10.  Frantically check log files to make sure everything looks okay.
>
> 11.  Try a few updates on the master database and verify that they
> have been propagated to the subscribers.  Swear like a longshoreman
> if they have not.  See step 14.
>
> 12.  At this point, the cluster should be updated to slony 1.2.11,
> I'm not sure how I can verify this, but I'll settle for DB changes
> getting properly propagated.
>
> 13.  Over the next few days, peer continuously at the log files for
> any weirdness.
>
> 14.  If things don't Go Well, make a nuisance of
> myself^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H Politely ask intelligent
> questions in #postgresql and #slony.  Refer to step 11.
>
> Questions:
>
> 1.  Should the slons be running when I run "update functions"?
>
> 2.  How can I verify that I am indeed running version 1.2.11 when all
> is said and done?
>
> 3.  Will this method of compiling "new" versions of postgresql
> (rather than upgrading an existing install) allow me to "downgrade"
> to slony 1.1.5 if things go poorly?  If things don't work out, can I
> just bring up the old postgresql (the one compiled with 1.1.5) and
> run the 1.1.5 "update functions" again to kind of "back out" the
> upgrade?  If there some other, preferable way of downgrading?
>
> 4.  Are there any detailed docs on what exactly "update functions"  
> does?
>
>
> How close is this to correct?  Many, many thanks to anyone who has
> made it this far through my post and to anyone who has any comments
> or suggestions regarding this proposed upgrade process.  I sure would
> love any feedback anyone is willing to supply!
>
> Thanks!
>
> /kurt
>
>
> On Aug 30, 2007, at 10:12 AM, Sam Cooley wrote:
>
>>> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 20:23:57 -0400
>>> From: Kurt Overberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Subject: Re: [Slony1-general] Setting up log shipping node
>>> To: Brad Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>
>>> Brad,
>>>
>>
>> ...
>>
>>> (compile new slony, get the libs into postgresql, then run update
>>> functions), but is it really that simple?  Should I not be nervous
>>> and plow ahead?  How easy is it to find a consultant who knows  
>>> how to
>>> do this stuff (confidently)?
>>
>> Hopefully somebody else will give you this advice; being thorough and
>> methodic with your planning and testing should make upgrades
>> smoother.  I
>> do not profess to be an expert on slony/pg myself but would be
>> happy to
>> look at your upgrade plans if you can not find another set of
>> eyes.  I may
>> be going through a similar upgrade in the near future and would be
>> happy
>> to work on the thinking.
>>
>> Good luck,
>>
>> Sam cooley
>>
>>> Thanks for the reply, its greatly appreciated!
>>>
>>> /kurt
>>
>>
>
> Kurt Overberg
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Slony1-general mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general

Kurt Overberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_______________________________________________
Slony1-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general

Reply via email to