On 4/5/2007 12:13 PM, Darcy Buskermolen wrote:
On April 5, 2007 09:11 am, David Fetter wrote:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 12:52:06AM -0400, Christopher Browne wrote:
> I had a chat with Jan about some of the forthcoming changes we're
> thinking about for the next major version...
>
> In general, there's a thought of doing a fairly *enormous* amount of
> cleanup, falling fundamentally out of the presence of hooks in PG 8.3
> that will allow Slony-I to work without any of the current catalog
> corruptions. The cleanup we're thinking of is of extensive enough
> nature that it might even be that "version 2.0" would only work with
> PG 8.3 'and above.'
>
> The scope of that, in total, I'll let Jan comment on, so as to allow
> debate on the merits of that.
>
> I'll draw back to a rather smaller, but not unimportant, matter...
>
> My position at this point is that dropping the "TABLE ADD KEY" feature
> is highly desirable.
+1 on dropping it. This is a case where "helping" people to shoot
themselves in the foot really isn't helping them.
+1 here. I think I've already voiced my thougt on this in an earlyer email as
well. :-)
It was a misfeature to begin with.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== [EMAIL PROTECTED] #
_______________________________________________
Slony1-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
