On 4/5/07, Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/5/2007 12:13 PM, Darcy Buskermolen wrote:
> On April 5, 2007 09:11 am, David Fetter wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 12:52:06AM -0400, Christopher Browne wrote:
>> > I had a chat with Jan about some of the forthcoming changes we're
>> > thinking about for the next major version...
>> >
>> > In general, there's a thought of doing a fairly *enormous* amount of
>> > cleanup, falling fundamentally out of the presence of hooks in PG 8.3
>> > that will allow Slony-I to work without any of the current catalog
>> > corruptions. The cleanup we're thinking of is of extensive enough
>> > nature that it might even be that "version 2.0" would only work with
>> > PG 8.3 'and above.'
>> >
>> > The scope of that, in total, I'll let Jan comment on, so as to allow
>> > debate on the merits of that.
>> >
>> > I'll draw back to a rather smaller, but not unimportant, matter...
>> >
>> > My position at this point is that dropping the "TABLE ADD KEY" feature
>> > is highly desirable.
>>
>> +1 on dropping it. This is a case where "helping" people to shoot
>> themselves in the foot really isn't helping them.
>
> +1 here. I think I've already voiced my thougt on this in an earlyer email as
> well. :-)
>
It was a misfeature to begin with.
+1 for reasons previously expressed.
Andrew
_______________________________________________
Slony1-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
