On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:16:11 +0100, "Stéphane A. Schildknecht"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> 1 is master, 2 and 3 are slave, so in Y. I test "move set", with 2 in
> master and 3 and 1 in slave, also in Y, and it's the same.
>>
>> But I "drop node" the third, and failover work, with only 2 node !
>
> Regarding documentation and my experience, you should be able to failover
> in Y
> also.
>
> If you have
> 1
> / \
> 2 3
>
> and execute failover( id=1, backup node=2), you should get
> 2
> |
> 3
>
> What do you have in sl_subscribe table before and after failover ?
Yes, when it work, i agree,
Before failover, i've got :
bar=# select * from _qsr_repl.sl_subscribe ;
sub_set | sub_provider | sub_receiver | sub_forward | sub_active
---------+--------------+--------------+-------------+------------
1 | 1 | 2 | f | t
1 | 1 | 3 | f | t
(2 rows)
And after too, because failover fail, and so nothing is done.
--
Sébastien
_______________________________________________
Slony1-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
