Sebastien Lardiere a écrit : > On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:55:42 +0100, Sebastien Lardiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >>>> Shouldn't node 2 and/or 3 be forwarder if you want to use one of them >> as >>> a >>>> master ? >>> You're right, i enable forward for 2 and 3, and then failover work. >>> > > Ok, it work, and i understand why i've got some error : > > - I have to set all direct receiver with forward = yes > > - When I do failover, i have to wait before send "drop node" for remover the > old master.
Did you have to explicitly drop the node ? Documentation says it is done on every subscriber by the failover command. (so does slonik source code). > > Perhaps somewhere in the documentation, it could be write that in case of > failover, future master and direct receiver have to be set with forward = yes > ? > It's explained here : http://slony.info/adminguide/slony1-1.2.6/doc/adminguide/stmtsubscribeset.html In fact, it is said that you should turn it off if you are *certain* you will *never* fail or switch against that node. Best regards, SAS _______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
