"David Rees" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 3:02 PM, David Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Jeff Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Fri, 16 May 2008, Christopher Browne wrote: >>>> Jeff Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>>> Hrmmm..I get this when trying to update functions: >>>>> >>>>> ./upgrade.slonik:5: Possible unsupported PostgreSQL version 8.3, >>>>> defaulting to 8.1 support > > Looks like there is two places where the versions are checked in > slonik.c, around like 1900 and around line 2000. The code should > probably be moved in to a common function, but attached is a quick > patch to make them match. > > At this point the message is completely harmless and only cosmetic.
Right you are! Happily, the message is, as you say, harmless and cosmetic. The code is doing the right things anyways. I'll see about patching this (not today; I'm at PGCon) so it appears to behave right, instead of merely doing so :-). It is indeed irritating that this code occurs twice; it is essentially eliminated in v2.0, so I don't think it's worth going to much effort to do the "big fix." -- "cbbrowne","@","acm.org" http://cbbrowne.com/info/oses.html "I still maintain the point that designing a monolithic kernel in 1991 is a fundamental error. Be thankful you are not my student. You would not get a high grade for such a design :-)" -- Andrew Tanenbaum to Linus Torvalds _______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
