I did drop one of my replicas several weeks ago, though I didn’t recreate the node. I do have automation to do exactly that, however, if a replica becomes defective somehow. Seems I’ll need to consider the point of the two log switches. Is that important even if the dropped node isn’t a provider for anybody?
Tom :-) On 2/2/16, 12:06 AM, "Jan Wieck" <j...@wi3ck.info> wrote: >On 02/01/2016 01:24 PM, Tignor, Tom wrote: >> >> Quick update: a couple hours after deleting entries from both sl_log >> tables with txids > 630M, it appears the cleanup thread has taken care >>of >> business. sl_log_1 is down from 54GB to 24KB. > >I still wonder how that happened in the first place. > >Was there a sequence of dropping and re-creating a node recently? I >think I have seen cases like this where if a node is re-created with the >same node ID before the cleanup of data, belonging to the dropped node, >had happened everywhere. The "cleanup" I am talking about is basically 2 >complete log switches on all nodes after the DROP NODE had replicated >everywhere. That takes at least 20-30 minutes and can in some cases take >hours. > > >Regards, Jan > > >> >> Tom :-) >> >> >> On 2/1/16, 9:06 AM, "Tignor, Tom" <ttig...@akamai.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> Jan, >>> Thanks much for all the help. I’ve been looking over logswitch finish >>>and >>>the event and changelog tables. Selecting logswitch_finish() on one of >>>my >>>replicas simply returned ""Slony-I: log switch to sl_log_2 still in >>>progress - sl_log_1 not truncated” All three seem to be in that state >>>with >>>either sl_log_1 or sl_log_2. Looking closer at sl_event and sl_log_2 I’m >>>seeing some strangeness. >>> >>>ams=# select min(pg_catalog.txid_snapshot_xmin(ev_snapshot)), >>>max(pg_catalog.txid_snapshot_xmin(ev_snapshot)) from >>>_ams_cluster.sl_event >>>where ev_origin = 1; >>> min | max >>>-----------+----------- >>> 139136948 | 139204299 >>>(1 row) >>> >>> >>>ams=# select min(log_txid), max(log_txid) from _ams_cluster.sl_log_2 >>>where >>>log_origin = 1; >>> min | max >>>-----------+----------- >>> 631532717 | 631661386 >>>(1 row) >>> >>> >>>ams=# >>> >>> >>> So I understand all the txids referenced in sl_event are in the 139M >>>range while all those in sl_log_2 are in the 631M range. Normally, the >>>sl_log txids should be older, shouldn’t they? Do you think I’ve hit a >>>txid-wraparound problem? >>> >>> Tom :-) >>> >>> >>> >>>On 1/28/16, 1:09 PM, "Jan Wieck" <j...@wi3ck.info> wrote: >>> >>>>On 01/28/2016 11:11 AM, Tignor, Tom wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Output below. They seem to be replicating normally, except for the >>>>>sl_log >>>>> growth. >>>> >>>>Indeed. Is there anything in the slon logs for those nodes that says >>>>why >>>>it doesn't finish the log switch? >>>> >>>>Connect to the database as a the slony user. >>>> >>>>To check if a log switch is indeed in progress, do >>>> >>>> SELECT last_value FROM _ams_cluster.sl_log_status; >>>> >>>>It should be either 2 or 3. If it is 0 or 1, no log switch is in >>>>progress and you can start one with >>>> >>>> SELECCT _ams_cluster.logswitch_start(); >>>> >>>>If it is 2 or 3, then you can do >>>> >>>> SELECT _ams_cluster.logswitch_finish(); >>>> >>>>All these operations are harmless and will only do what is safely >>>>possible. Look at the code of logswitch_finish() to find out how it >>>>determines if the current log switch can be finished. In short, the >>>>cleanup thread is removing events from sl_event that have been >>>>confirmed >>>>by all nodes in the cluster. The function logswitch_finish() looks if >>>>there is anything left in sl_event, that belonged to that old log. If >>>>so >>>>it will not finish. Running those queries manually you can find out >>>>what >>>>that event is that is preventing the switch to finish. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> a...@ams-repl2.ams.netmgmt:~$ /a/third-party/postgresql/bin/psql -U >>>>> ams_slony -d ams -c 'select * from _ams_cluster.sl_status' >>>>> st_origin | st_received | st_last_event | st_last_event_ts >>>>> | >>>>> st_last_received | st_last_received_ts | >>>>> st_last_received_event_ts | st_lag_num_events | st_lag_time >>>>> >>>>>-----------+-------------+---------------+---------------------------- >>>>>-- >>>>>- >>>>>+- >>>>> >>>>>-----------------+-------------------------------+-------------------- >>>>>-- >>>>>- >>>>>-- >>>>> ------+-------------------+----------------- >>>>> 2 | 1 | 5000611610 | 2016-01-28 >>>>>16:06:37.343826+00 | >>>>> 5000611610 | 2016-01-28 16:06:38.843562+00 | 2016-01-28 >>>>> 16:06:37.343826+00 | 0 | 00:00:09.201996 >>>>> 2 | 3 | 5000611610 | 2016-01-28 >>>>>16:06:37.343826+00 | >>>>> 5000611609 | 2016-01-28 16:06:29.851545+00 | 2016-01-28 >>>>> 16:06:27.341894+00 | 1 | 00:00:19.203928 >>>>> 2 | 4 | 5000611610 | 2016-01-28 >>>>>16:06:37.343826+00 | >>>>> 5000611610 | 2016-01-28 16:06:38.710974+00 | 2016-01-28 >>>>> 16:06:37.343826+00 | 0 | 00:00:09.201996 >>>>> (3 rows) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> a...@ams-repl3.lga.netmgmt:~$ /a/third-party/postgresql/bin/psql -U >>>>> ams_slony -d ams -c 'select * from _ams_cluster.sl_status' >>>>> st_origin | st_received | st_last_event | st_last_event_ts >>>>> | >>>>> st_last_received | st_last_received_ts | >>>>> st_last_received_event_ts | st_lag_num_events | st_lag_time >>>>> >>>>>-----------+-------------+---------------+---------------------------- >>>>>-- >>>>>- >>>>>+- >>>>> >>>>>-----------------+-------------------------------+-------------------- >>>>>-- >>>>>- >>>>>-- >>>>> ------+-------------------+----------------- >>>>> 3 | 4 | 5000654642 | 2016-01-28 >>>>>16:07:05.493455+00 | >>>>> 5000654642 | 2016-01-28 16:07:06.486539+00 | 2016-01-28 >>>>> 16:07:05.493455+00 | 0 | 00:00:08.522529 >>>>> 3 | 1 | 5000654642 | 2016-01-28 >>>>>16:07:05.493455+00 | >>>>> 5000654642 | 2016-01-28 16:07:08.040292+00 | 2016-01-28 >>>>> 16:07:05.493455+00 | 0 | 00:00:08.522529 >>>>> 3 | 2 | 5000654642 | 2016-01-28 >>>>>16:07:05.493455+00 | >>>>> 5000654642 | 2016-01-28 16:07:08.472049+00 | 2016-01-28 >>>>> 16:07:05.493455+00 | 0 | 00:00:08.522529 >>>>> (3 rows) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> a...@ams-repl4.blr.netmgmt:~$ /a/third-party/postgresql/bin/psql -U >>>>> ams_slony -d ams -c 'select * from _ams_cluster.sl_status' >>>>> st_origin | st_received | st_last_event | st_last_event_ts >>>>> | >>>>> st_last_received | st_last_received_ts | >>>>> st_last_received_event_ts | st_lag_num_events | st_lag_time >>>>> >>>>>-----------+-------------+---------------+---------------------------- >>>>>-- >>>>>- >>>>>+- >>>>> >>>>>-----------------+-------------------------------+-------------------- >>>>>-- >>>>>- >>>>>-- >>>>> ------+-------------------+----------------- >>>>> 4 | 3 | 5000637483 | 2016-01-28 >>>>>16:07:32.698809+00 | >>>>> 5000637482 | 2016-01-28 16:07:28.731404+00 | 2016-01-28 >>>>> 16:07:22.695826+00 | 1 | 00:00:19.077657 >>>>> 4 | 1 | 5000637483 | 2016-01-28 >>>>>16:07:32.698809+00 | >>>>> 5000637482 | 2016-01-28 16:07:24.839978+00 | 2016-01-28 >>>>> 16:07:22.695826+00 | 1 | 00:00:19.077657 >>>>> 4 | 2 | 5000637483 | 2016-01-28 >>>>>16:07:32.698809+00 | >>>>> 5000637482 | 2016-01-28 16:07:22.926411+00 | 2016-01-28 >>>>> 16:07:22.695826+00 | 1 | 00:00:19.077657 >>>>> (3 rows) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Tom :-) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 1/28/16, 10:38 AM, "Jan Wieck" <j...@wi3ck.info> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On 01/28/2016 08:30 AM, Tignor, Tom wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello slony folks, >>>>>>> From my reading I¹m guessing (hoping) this isn¹t a new problem. I >>>>>>>have >>>>>>> a simple cluster with one provider replicating to three >>>>>>>subscribers. >>>>>>>The >>>>>>> provider¹s changelog tables (sl_log_[1|2]) are fine, but the >>>>>>>subscribers >>>>>>> (with forwarding enabled) are all showing runaway growth. Looked >>>>>>>through >>>>>>> the FAQ and I don¹t see the node I dropped or any idle transactions >>>>>>>as >>>>>>> viable culprits. Are there other thoughts on the cause? Can I >>>>>>>safely >>>>>>> manually delete/truncate some/all of the changelog tables? These >>>>>>> replicas are all leaf nodes. I only have forwarding turned on to >>>>>>>allow >>>>>>> for failover, and my replication rate is the 2 sec default. >>>>>>> Thanks in advance for any insights. >>>>>> >>>>>>What is the output of the sl_status view "on those leaf nodes"? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ams=# select >>>>>>> pg_size_pretty(pg_total_relation_size('_ams_cluster.sl_log_1')); >>>>>>> >>>>>>> pg_size_pretty >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ---------------- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 75 MB >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (1 row) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ams=# select >>>>>>> pg_size_pretty(pg_total_relation_size('_ams_cluster.sl_log_2')); >>>>>>> >>>>>>> pg_size_pretty >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ---------------- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 34 GB >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (1 row) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ams=# select * from _ams_cluster.sl_confirm where con_origin not in >>>>>>> (select no_id from _ams_cluster.sl_node) or con_received not in >>>>>>>(select >>>>>>> no_id from _ams_cluster.sl_node); >>>>>>> >>>>>>> con_origin | con_received | con_seqno | con_timestamp >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------+--------------+-----------+--------------- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (0 rows) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ams=# select * from pg_stat_activity where current_query like >>>>>>>'%IDLE%'; >>>>>>> >>>>>>> datid | datname | procpid | usesysid | usename | >>>>>>> application_name | client_addr | client_hostname | >>>>>>>client_port | >>>>>>> backend_start | xact_start | >>>>>>> query_start | waiting | >>>>>>> >>>>>>> current_query >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>-------+---------+---------+----------+------------+---------------- >>>>>>>-- >>>>>>>- >>>>>>>-- >>>>>>>------+----------------+-----------------+-------------+------------ >>>>>>>-- >>>>>>>- >>>>>>>-- >>>>>>>--------------+-------------------------------+--------------------- >>>>>>>-- >>>>>>>- >>>>>>>-- >>>>>>>-----+---------+--- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 16393 | ams | 2611 | 212995 | ams_viewer | >>>>>>> | 88.221.209.10 | | 43328 | >>>>>>>2016-01-28 >>>>>>> 12:24:49.706389+00 | | 2016-01-28 >>>>>>> 13:18:02.427848+00 | f | <I >>>>>>> >>>>>>> DLE> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 16393 | ams | 12894 | 212995 | ams_viewer | >>>>>>> | 88.221.209.10 | | 60112 | >>>>>>>2016-01-28 >>>>>>> 12:47:26.230681+00 | | 2016-01-28 >>>>>>> 13:15:27.744242+00 | f | <I >>>>>>> >>>>>>> DLE> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 16393 | ams | 12884 | 212995 | ams_viewer | >>>>>>> | 88.221.209.10 | | 44302 | >>>>>>>2016-01-28 >>>>>>> 12:47:25.100006+00 | | 2016-01-28 >>>>>>> 13:15:27.936059+00 | f | <I >>>>>>> >>>>>>> DLE> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 16393 | ams | 23466 | 213867 | ams_slony | psql >>>>>>> | | | -1 | >>>>>>>2016-01-28 >>>>>>> 13:11:32.030343+00 | 2016-01-28 13:18:37.283992+00 | 2016-01-28 >>>>>>> 13:18:37.283992+00 | f | se >>>>>>> >>>>>>> lect * from pg_stat_activity where current_query like '%IDLE%'; >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 16393 | ams | 6719 | 213867 | ams_slony | >>>>>>> slon.origin_2_provider_2 | 60.254.150.133 | | >>>>>>> 61806 | 2016-01-22 01:59:14.800129+00 | >>>>>>>| >>>>>>> 2016-01-28 13:18:25.935111+00 | f | <I >>>>>>> >>>>>>> DLE> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 16393 | ams | 6718 | 213867 | ams_slony | >>>>>>> slon.origin_3_provider_2 | 60.254.150.133 | | >>>>>>> 61805 | 2016-01-22 01:59:14.797655+00 | >>>>>>>| >>>>>>> 2016-01-28 13:18:34.304475+00 | f | <I >>>>>>> >>>>>>> DLE> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 16393 | ams | 5505 | 213867 | ams_slony | >>>>>>> slon.origin_4_provider_2 | 80.67.75.105 | | >>>>>>> 36477 | 2016-01-22 01:56:25.637046+00 | >>>>>>>| >>>>>>> 2016-01-28 13:18:36.1348+00 | f | <I >>>>>>> >>>>>>> DLE> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 16393 | ams | 5504 | 213867 | ams_slony | >>>>>>> slon.origin_3_provider_2 | 72.246.50.22 | | >>>>>>> 51813 | 2016-01-22 01:56:25.240798+00 | >>>>>>>| >>>>>>> 2016-01-28 13:18:28.961629+00 | f | <I >>>>>>> >>>>>>> DLE> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 16393 | ams | 5487 | 213867 | ams_slony | >>>>>>> slon.origin_4_provider_2 | 72.246.50.22 | | >>>>>>> 51803 | 2016-01-22 01:56:22.896388+00 | >>>>>>>| >>>>>>> 2016-01-28 13:18:35.858913+00 | f | <I >>>>>>> >>>>>>> DLE> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 16393 | ams | 5047 | 213867 | ams_slony | >>>>>>> slon.origin_2_provider_2 | 72.246.50.22 | | >>>>>>> 51564 | 2016-01-22 01:55:23.600296+00 | >>>>>>>| >>>>>>> 2016-01-28 13:18:34.487192+00 | f | <I >>>>>>> >>>>>>> DLE> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 16393 | ams | 5041 | 213867 | ams_slony | >>>>>>> slon.origin_2_provider_2 | 80.67.75.105 | | >>>>>>> 36402 | 2016-01-22 01:55:22.964462+00 | >>>>>>>| >>>>>>> 2016-01-28 13:18:34.519066+00 | f | <I >>>>>>> >>>>>>> DLE> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 16393 | ams | 6694 | 213867 | ams_slony | >>>>>>> slon.node_2_listen | 60.254.150.133 | | >>>>>>> 61795 | 2016-01-22 01:59:12.095052+00 | >>>>>>>| >>>>>>> 2016-01-28 13:18:27.928384+00 | f | <I >>>>>>> >>>>>>> DLE> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 16393 | ams | 4456 | 213867 | ams_slony | >>>>>>> slon.node_2_listen | 72.246.50.22 | | >>>>>>> 51238 | 2016-01-22 01:54:21.481355+00 | >>>>>>>| >>>>>>> 2016-01-28 13:18:36.766973+00 | f | <I >>>>>>> >>>>>>> DLE> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 16393 | ams | 4457 | 213867 | ams_slony | >>>>>>> slon.node_2_listen | 80.67.75.105 | | >>>>>>> 36333 | 2016-01-22 01:54:21.500456+00 | >>>>>>>| >>>>>>> 2016-01-28 13:18:36.204482+00 | f | <I >>>>>>> >>>>>>> DLE> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 16393 | ams | 4428 | 213867 | ams_slony | >>>>>>> slon.local_monitor | | | >>>>>>> -1 | 2016-01-22 01:54:18.977015+00 | >>>>>>>| >>>>>>> 2016-01-28 13:18:36.652567+00 | f | <I >>>>>>> >>>>>>> DLE> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 16393 | ams | 4427 | 213867 | ams_slony | >>>>>>>slon.local_sync >>>>>>> | | | -1 | >>>>>>>2016-01-22 >>>>>>> 01:54:18.976932+00 | | 2016-01-28 >>>>>>> 13:18:36.151998+00 | f | <I >>>>>>> >>>>>>> DLE> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 16393 | ams | 4426 | 213867 | ams_slony | >>>>>>> slon.local_cleanup | | | >>>>>>> -1 | 2016-01-22 01:54:18.976842+00 | >>>>>>>| >>>>>>> 2016-01-28 13:12:12.582921+00 | f | <I >>>>>>> >>>>>>> DLE> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 16393 | ams | 4425 | 213867 | ams_slony | >>>>>>> slon.remoteWorkerThread_4 | | | >>>>>>> -1 | 2016-01-22 01:54:18.976783+00 | >>>>>>>| >>>>>>> 2016-01-28 13:18:33.99715+00 | f | <I >>>>>>> >>>>>>> DLE> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 16393 | ams | 4420 | 213867 | ams_slony | >>>>>>> slon.remoteWorkerThread_1 | | | >>>>>>> -1 | 2016-01-22 01:54:18.976548+00 | >>>>>>>| >>>>>>> 2016-01-28 13:18:33.561531+00 | f | <I >>>>>>> >>>>>>> DLE> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 16393 | ams | 4419 | 213867 | ams_slony | >>>>>>> slon.remoteWorkerThread_3 | | | >>>>>>> -1 | 2016-01-22 01:54:18.97647+00 | >>>>>>>| >>>>>>> 2016-01-28 13:18:34.808907+00 | f | <I >>>>>>> >>>>>>> DLE> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 16393 | ams | 4413 | 213867 | ams_slony | >>>>>>>slon.local_listen >>>>>>> | | | -1 | >>>>>>>2016-01-22 >>>>>>> 01:54:18.965568+00 | | 2016-01-28 >>>>>>> 13:18:37.096159+00 | f | <I >>>>>>> >>>>>>> DLE> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (21 rows) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ams=# >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Tom :-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Slony1-general mailing list >>>>>>> Slony1-general@lists.slony.info >>>>>>> http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>-- >>>>>>Jan Wieck >>>>>>Senior Software Engineer >>>>>>http://slony.info >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>-- >>>>Jan Wieck >>>>Senior Software Engineer >>>>http://slony.info >>> >> > > >-- >Jan Wieck >Senior Software Engineer >http://slony.info _______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list Slony1-general@lists.slony.info http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general