Sl_subscribe of my test : 
sub_set;sub_provider;sub_receiver;sub_forward;sub_active
1;1;2;FALSE;TRUE
1;1;130;FALSE;TRUE

Sl_path :
pa_server;pa_client;pa_conninfo
1;2;dbname=DB host=192.168.0.29 port=5432 user=slony password=123;10
1;130;dbname=DB host=192.168.0.29 port=5432 user=slony password=123;10
2;1;dbname=DB host=192.168.0.3 port=5432 user=slony password=123;10
130;1;dbname=DB host=192.168.0.230 port=5432 user=slony password=123;10

Sub_forward true or false change nothing...

Thx for your help.

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Steve Singer [mailto:st...@ssinger.info] 
Envoyé : jeudi 19 juillet 2018 05:42
À : Sébastien Marchand
Cc : slony1-general@lists.slony.info
Objet : Re: [Slony1-general] Problème with sl_listen and too many nodes

On Wed, 18 Jul 2018, Sébastien Marchand wrote:

What is sl_subscribe?

(I assume sl_path has paths between each node)




> 
> Hello,
> 
>  
> 
> I have a problem with the sl_listen table.
> 
> I have a replication that has been running for a very long time from a
master to X slaves (1 master
> node for 18 nodes)
> 
> My concern comes from the sl_listen table which instead of just containing
what it needs it creates
> all the possible combinations.
> 
> For example I have a test for 1 master and 2 slaves and I have 4 too many
lines that are useless
> for me:
> 
>  
> 
> SL_LISTEN table
> 
> origin; provider; receiver
> 
> 1, 1, 2
> 
> 1; 1; 130
> 
> 2; 1; 130
> 
> 2; 2; 1
> 
> 2; 130; 1
> 
> 130, 1, 2
> 
> 130, 2, 1
> 
> 130; 130; 1
> 
>  
> 
> Here after cleaning what should be:
> 
>  
> 
> origin; provider; receiver
> 
> 1, 1, 2
> 
> 1; 1; 130
> 
> 2; 2; 1
> 
> 130; 130; 1
> 
>  
> 
> The problem is that with each add / delete of tables / nodes the table is
re-filled again and I
> have to redo the cleaning.
> 
>  
> 
> My final question is: Is it normal for all nodes to talk to each other?
> 
>  
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Slony1-general mailing list
Slony1-general@lists.slony.info
http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general

Reply via email to