>Thinclients will probably run into the same problem, unless the client
>is written to do all the gui grunt, so that can rule out cheap
>hardware.
>
>Then the problem will be the networking. I noticed that none of the
>costings included network upgrades to handle the extra network
>traffic.
Further to this concern, here a snippet from a recent message from the
LTSP mailing list:
|I have to go live with about 30 nodes within one week wtih up to 50 more soon
|after so time pressure is on also. This decision was made by the big man today
|after we had him running it and he did not relize that it was not windows(KDE
|I modified to look as much like windoze as possible). He then asked my boss why
|on earth are we paying CITRIX such a big pile of money.
|
|You should have seen the look on his face when we told him he was looking at a
|Linux thin client.
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux Users Group Mailing List - http://www.slug.org.au
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe in the text
