Thanks Barrie,
okay - reverse delegation was something I didn't think about.
Let me see I understand what you said...
To keep my WAN IP address resolving doesn't that mean it has to be assigned
to *something*? so if ppp0 was assigned to a Local IP
how would the WAN get resolved? (i probably way off track...)
>From an earlier post, Michael suggested:
ppp0 -> WAN IP [139.130.xxx.xxx]
eth0 -> Local IP [203.42.xxx.xxx]
This would mean both IP's can be seen from Inet...
I'm currently using eth0 for IP-Chains masquerading.
so it's assigned to [192.168.1.1] would I just add
another network card and assign to eth1? This would
break the rulesets, so have to rewrite them right?
Regards,
Adrian.
>No, Telstra need your WAN endpoint to be well known and fully resolved at
>all times, they assign the name and manage DNS for it (telstra.net)
does that mean if I
>
>Cheers,
>
>
>Barrie
>
>
>Barrie Hall
>Senior Consulting Engineer
>Senteq Information Systems
>Internet Services Group
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux Users Group Mailing List - http://www.slug.org.au
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe in the text
