For what it's worth, Domino's http stack is pretty good. And it's arguably
easier to set up virtual servers, etc, under Domino than Linux (humble
opinino). I'm going to be installing the Linux version soon (next couple
of weeks, max)... if you can wait, I'll give you a report later.
Cheers,
Travis
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Howard Lowndes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: Mail List - SLUG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Lotus Domino Server
On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, Howard Lowndes wrote:
> Does anyone have any experiences with integrating LDS R5 with Linux that
> they would be prepared to share. I have a customer who is considering
> pursuing that path and I would like to keep them out of Evilware hands.
I've installed it {well, the last beta} for test purposes.
It's a bit of a pain to install, compared to the Evilware version - and
you have to ditch Apache {if you're running it} and use the Domino web
server.
But apart from that, it runs on less resources and is at least as reliable
as the WindoZe version.
I admit, I didn't really give it a full production load - only half a
dozen databases, and about 100 mailboxes - but it worked OK for me.
And you _don't_ have to shut the bugger down every week or so because of
NT memory leaks!
DaZZa
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux Users Group Mailing List - http://www.slug.org.au
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe in the text
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux Users Group Mailing List - http://www.slug.org.au
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe in the text
