Yeah, fair enough. *slaps forehead*
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I think you'll find they have a subnet of 203.x.x.x addresses they want to use.
> Thus allowing a select few of pc's on that network to have real ip's.
>
> Quoting Matthew Dalton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >
> > Ummm... you shouldn't be using the 203.x.x.x range on your internal
> > interfaces. There are designated ranges especially for this -
> > 192.168.x.x is the one that I use. This could be playing havoc with your
> > routing as well.
>
> -------------------------------------------------
> This mail sent through IMP: wm.mafnet.com
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux Users Group Mailing List - http://www.slug.org.au
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe in the text
