Connecting machine 3 the way you have on the same hub with those settings is a
bad bad bad idea..
I am sure plenty will point out why.. but I don't have time to go into detail
just right now
Quoting erich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Without knowing your subnet masking {but assuming a standard class C
> mask
> > of 255.255.255.0}, you have a single machine with two IP addresses on
> the
> > same subnet but different interfaces. From memory, this will
> completely
> > screw routing. The box won't know which interface to throw packets for
> the
> > subnet out on.
>
> I then have a question, could the following setup work? ( I am not
> syaing it is the best)
>
> Machine 1: internet gateway
> PPP0: 139.x.x.x, netmask ?
> eth0: 203.x.x.1 netmask 255.255.255.0
> default route GW = 139.x.x.x ppp0
> route add net 192.168.0.0 eht0
> route add net 203.x.x.0 eht0
>
> which gets connected to the local hub.
>
> On the same hub:
>
> Machine 2: NT box with web server
> eth0: 203.x.x.2 netmask 255.255.255.0
> dafault route GW=139.x.x.x eth0
> I don't know how to add routes to NT Machines
>
> Machine 3 and more on the same hub but with private addresses
> eth0: 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0
> route add net 203.x.x.0 eht0
> default route GW = 139.x.x.x eth0
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Erich
> --
> SLUG - Sydney Linux Users Group Mailing List - http://www.slug.org.au
> To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> unsubscribe in the text
>
-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: wm.mafnet.com
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux Users Group Mailing List - http://www.slug.org.au
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe in the text
